A Probabilistic Approach to Cognitive Functions and Social Dynamics
Personality Theory is a generalization of cognitive theory and social dynamics that tries to predict relationship dynamics between people on the higher level of abstraction. It predicts the most probable relationship dynamics given peoples cognitive structures and therefore it works statistically, predicting most likely relationships and their relationships types. It is innate to people and stands as a constant measure of a given persons personality even if it doesn't represent its exact definition or actions. It will suggest the most probable one.
Personality Theory predicts the formation of social circles given a group of people. It also predicts the type of relationship between people and their dynamic. It will also represent most common behaviours, interests, goals, hobbys and much more.
This model observes that people tend to group around common cognitive function groups, creating 8 main types, while each person is a combination of 2 cognitive functions (creating 16 types total 8*2) because everyone needs to have both rational and perceptive functions and they need to alternate by introversion/extroversion. Groups form around the most pronounced social dynamic that emerges through many interactions between group members in an given environment.
Cognitive functions are divided into two main categories:
There is a Chirality of perspectives when looking into personality theory, where we can have 2 worlds of looking into things: rational and observational worlds. Each person can have a dominant perceptive or rational function as their primary functions in any given moment.
All relationship types can be generalized. Using Ne-Ti as a base, we can look at the differences in type structure to generalize to your specific type. Here are the primary relationship dynamics:
Example: Ne-Ti and Ti-Ne
Formed by fliping your cognitive function ordering.
A strong relationship that communicates by exchanging same type of information, offering clearer and more in-depth similar perspectives towards each other's worldview due to small differences.
Example: Ne-Ti and Ne-Ti
Copying your exact type.
Same type relationships tend not to form, possibly because of too similar worldviews, and little to no benefit in exchange of information because of similar beliefs and perspectives, generally neutral.
Example: Ne-Fi and Ne-Ti
Formed by exanging secundary function with only other option.
Characterized by the dominant function where both tend to dominate the conversation by changing rational or in chiral relationship perspectives views, generally strong relationships.
Example: Ne-Ti and Ni-Te / Ni-Fe
Formed by flipping the sign in the first function I/E.
This relationship usually naturally goes towards flirting, and completing or fulfiling conversations. Similar dynamics exist between Te-Ni and Fe-Ni (flipped ordering of function) to a smaller measure.
Example: Ne-Ti and Fi-Ne
Formed by flipping the order of sisterly function stack.
Tends to create stable long term relationships, likely because of a more stable sisterly relationship which tends to be eratic and strong, allowing each other to appreciate the other person's ideals and offering more room for creating a optimal social dynamic.
Example: Ne-Ti-Fe and Fi-Se-Ni
Formed by finding a type with compatible tertiary function with your primary and other way around.
This relationship usually tends to force both sides to form a stronger relationship but fails to materialize because of the too strong attachment to tertiary functions, causing conflict and stress.
Example: Ne-Ti and Si-Fe
Formed by fliping both sign and type for each function.
Characterized by mismatch in perception and rational functions, offering a lot of stress and conflict followed by fighting. This occurs because it strains the lowest functions that are the least flexible in decision making.
Example: Ne-Ti and Si-Te
Formed by fliping both sign and type for primary and only sign for secundary function.
These relationships can work usually beacause the primary function is most flexible and lower functions are not. You will fight for perception (or in ciral relationships, for rational), but in the end, you'll understand what the other person is trying to say and get along up to a point.
Using Ne-Ti as an example, here's how the cognitive functions stack and operate within a personality:
Every personality also has more independent personas which are lower functioning consciousness entities that help you think, usually working with the main persona on tought:
Focuses on relaying information and runs the fastests. Shapes your reactive immediate answers and responses, usually to people that don't know you.
Focuses mainly on what other people do, how to act, and what is going to happen in short to medium terms. Shapes your friend circle and who you hang around with.
Focuses on your career, hobbies, what is important to you, and what you're going to orient your life around. Shapes what type of college you enter, what job you take, and what you work on in your creative side during free time.
Regulates that everything is okay or if you're under stress, or attacked it lashes out. It regulates your deepest desires, what you yearn for in life, and what impulse decisions (you can't avoid).
Each persona has its complexity and expressity that they tend to. Complexity indicates how complex is a given thought process. It operates similarly to IQ but changes drastically for every 30-point increment:
No recognition:
You usually praise success:
You usually blame yourselfs:
You usually blame concepts:
You usually blame people:
You usually blame yourself:
You usually blame time:
Note: This is just a generalisation of behaviour of different CC and does not represent their expression. Only probabilistic guess of average lenght of tought process that generated that responce.
You can also seperate conversations by the context in which they operate:
Note: no type is smarter or dumber; it just changes the perspective, and people change types and complexity frequently. Most people tend to stick to type most promenant in a given Social Dynamic.
All types tend to have common descriptions or indentifiers:
Round face, longer chaotic hair, inquisitive talkative look, lack of attention. Usually loves anime and random conceptual topics.
Long face, shorter clean hair, deep look, lots of attention. Usually loves deep complex topic, and consipracy/murder mysteries.
Round face, longer cool hair, ready to talk and exange information. Usually likes sport, local stories.
Long face, shorter organized hair, likes to stick to the point. Usually likes to talk about family, statements about life.
Smiling, fluffy hair, ready to help. Likes to talk about relationships and books
Judging look, prominent destinct features (makeup, pircings, tattos). Likes to talk about personal idols, and music.
To the point, Hard look. Likes to talk about true statements, opprotunity's for job,school...
Denial look, will tell you if you are wrong. Likes to talk about solved problems, and tips on how to solve them.